What will Apple look like by 2010?
Well, Apple is 30. Thirty years in the IT industry is 10 or so lifetimes. Who knows where Apple will be in 30 years, but an interesting hypothesis is where it will be in one more lifetime, in three and a bit years, at the end of 2009, the end of the first decade of the 21st century.
For your entertainment, I’m going to propose two scenarios - two extreme scenarios at that. These are fictitious, no crystal balls, no inside goss, just pure slightly educated fiction. Afterwards, you can suggest your own theory on Apple, 2010. It’s a little under four years away. That might not seem long, but consider that the iTunes Music Store is only just on three years old, and so much has changed since it’s introduction.
Apple, 2010: R.I.P.
The ink has barely dried on Sony’s buyout of Apple and already the once mighty iPod has now been made PlaysForSure compatible. It needed it though. Furthermore, Sony has taken the best of the Mac plus the failed OS XI and incorporated it in its own line of media center PCs. A sad end to the once glorious Macintosh personal computer
It’s hard not to wonder where Apple went wrong. Again. This time though it was fatal. Four years ago its shares peaked at $100 (and there was a share split a year earlier, so effectively that $100 was $200), four years before that they were $12 and the iPod was still Mac only. In four years so much can happen. And it did.
The pundits are being glib saying Apple held on to its proprietary technologies for too long, until it was too late. But there were many factors. The loss of the DRM wars when the music industry decided in 2007 that there must be one and only one standard. FairPlay became DRM’s version of BetaMax. As it has done so many times before, Microsoft won again.
The switch to Intel ultimately brought too much competition. Apple could not hold back the tidal wave of hacked versions of its OS X, made to run on generic PCs. Attempting to play catch up, Apple licensed OS X to Dell who didn’t give it the support that Apple wanted. With the failure of that attempted foray into the PC market, Apple began to flounder. 2008 was a bad year for Apple, and 2009 began even worse, with the retirement of Steve Job’s due to ill health. It was unsurprising. The stress of the previous two years would have taken down a man half his age.
Jonathon Ive’s appointment to CEO was seen by many as an excellent decision as he alone could match Steve for vision. Unfortunately the board was impatient and never really giving him a chance. And then began the clandestine negotiations with Sony.
Apple, we’re missing you already.
Or maybe you’re of the positive scenario
Apple, 2010: From Strength to Strength
The news just came through that Apple have usurped the Dell as the #1 personal computer maker, reaching 16%. Of course, its overall marketshare is even greater, considering the big three, Dell, HP and Lenovo all sell Mac boxes. The iPod halo effect continues to sell Macs and the licensing of OS X to those three in 2007 provided a massive windfall for Apple. The timing couldn’t have been better, with the frustrations of Microsoft’s Vista, and Linux’s inability to get any significant support from any of the major commercial application developers. Further, the signing of Lenovo was critical to Apple’s success, leveraging them into the huge Chinese market.
Apple’s FairPlay’s anointment by the music industry as the standard for DRM had a crippling affect on Microsoft’s ambition in the the crucial media market which had by 2009, significantly converged with the personal computer market. This further enhanced the iPod’s halo effect. Although, this decision meant Apple had to licence FairPlay to other vendors, it’s dominance meant Apple could afford to loose some marketshare - especially as it picked up some of the difference in licence fees.
But one event stands head and shoulders above all others as being the reason for Apple’s rise to desktop power, and Microsoft’s plummet - The Black Death plague of 2008. Just as Vista was itself spreading, the Black Death came and wiped out any chance of Vista’s success. It’s estimated 60% of Windows computers were affected, rendering them unusable for days or even weeks as over worked techies worked around the clock to rebuild computers. But it was the final straw. Many users simply cut their losses and bought Macs and Linux machines. Governments wholesale made the switch. Apple, with the major commercial software vendors already onside, benefitted most. The Black Death was so called because it caused the user’s computer to shutdown, leaving them staring at a black screen. It was a dastardly virus that simply latched onto packets of information sailing around the internet, and sought out Windows computers. Because of its speed and the way it transmitted, anti-virus companies were for some time, powerless to stop it. And by the time they had a solution, it was way, way too late. Ironically, older Windows versions were unaffected, only XP and Vista. All computers transmitted the virus - even Macs and Linux - but only those Windows computers were infected. Ironically, Symantec and other anti-virus companies had to distribute updates via Macs, Linux and older Windows PCs. This certainly helped promote the rapid uptake of Macs. And although Apple and the Linux community released patches to block the virus at their computers, the damage was done. Hospitals, defense forces, communications, utilities were all affected. People died. Worldwide, IT managers who committed to a dependence on Windows were terminated, no questions asked.
In 2010 Apple is at it’s most solid in its history. Despite Steve Jobs having to step down in 2009 due to ill health (replaced by Phil Schiller, a man who could match Steve’s passion for the the end user experience), Apple’s own health continues to get more and more robust, with the sickly years of the ‘90s long forgotten.
Despite suggesting in both scenarios that Steve will be forced to retire due to health, it’s not something I’m predicting or expect. In both pieces I wanted to explore what might happen without Steve in control, but I didn’t want to go down the soap opera path, and bump him off. I didn’t want to to put the mozz on him that bad.
Where do you think Apple will be in 2010?
So that’s my two extremes. Where do you think Apple will be at the dawn of the next decade?

Comments
I think the release and implementation of “Boot Camp” as a standalone now, and as part of Leopard when it’s released should present a third scenerio.
I don’t want to sound pesimist, but the first scenario is a very likely and a very real future for apple in terms of OS X hacked to run on generic PCs
Nemin: Apple is now and has always been a hardware company as well as a software company, and the XP on Mac benchmarks show that Apple makes damn good computers. If someone wants to buy a copy of OS X and run it on a cheap PC, why would that be bad for Apple? They still make money. Plus there’s no reason to think that a person who decides to run OS X on a PC ever planned to buy a Mac, so it’s not like Apple is losing a hardware sale. Anyway most people don’t want to rely on a hacked OS. I think you underestimate the appeal of Apple hardware, and overestimate the appeal of running a superior OS on crappy hardware.
What seems more likely to me is something closer to the positive scenario, but not all the way.
I see Apple in a better position than they are in today, but not the #1 PC manufacturer or anything.
Also, no Mac clones. No way.
I’ve never understood the opposition to clones. Pay less money for the exact same product? Sign me up!
If Apple could sell Leopard OS discs for $99 each to everyone who wanted one, regardless of what kind of hardware they intended to use it with, they’d simply make a lot more money than they do in the hardware game. A $99 software CD - development and support costs aside - is $98.95 in markup, hardware isn’t anywhere close to that - just ask Microsoft who continues to take a bath on Xbox.
Though I don’t agree with either scenario, I do believe that a major shift in the industry is just beginning and though it may not favor Apple specifically, it certainly will not favor Dell. While some see Microsoft as the enemy, I see Dell and HP as such. I love Sony PC’s, I love Alienware PC’s, heck I even have an eMachines laptop that plays a great game and is speedy as all get out.. but the cookie cutter cheapo mentality that has propelled HP and Dell into the sales stratosphere is potentially the exact same thing that will bring them back down to earth. Neither brand is ‘hip’ and neither brand seems able to deal well with the fact that they just don’t get repeat customers - well, not very many anyway. Apple users are religious to a fault, I know it, you know it, and I’m just as guilty as anyone. We love this crap, sometimes even for reasons unknown to us. Apple gets repeat customers - unfortunately it just doesn’t get as many new ones as Dell and HP, et al.
Here’s how I see it… The marketing strategy behind Vista comes as a shock to everyone and MS extends their lifespan another 5 years, even growing a little bit. A couple of new-comer PC makers move up the ranks and boot either HP or Dell (but not both) out of existence and the remaining titan buys out the other. Apple gains some serious (by their standards) marketshare in the meantime but continues to be more niche than mass-market.
After all, we’re only a little more than 4.5 years away from 2010 here.
As for clones, if you can solve the problems that Windows XP has with multiple drivers for multiple devices for multiple pieces of software then I’m all for it. Right now Apple does that more or less for us. In a more open market we obviously wouldn’t have that sort of leisure. I do not fondly remember the days of installing my new graphics driver to work with a new game only to find out that now 2 of my older games don’t work anymore. It’s just plain dumb and a complete waste of time.
I even have an eMachines laptop that plays a great game and is speedy as all get out.
Me too! It’s one of the reasons I don’t understand this obsession with Dell, as if they’re the only makers of PCs. My eMachine is just as powerful and a helluva lot cheaper.
As for clones, if you can solve the problems that Windows XP has with multiple drivers for multiple devices for multiple pieces of software then I’m all for it.
Almost every major PC out-of-the-box has drivers already installed that work just fine for included hardware. I don’t see much difference here between boxed PCs and boxed Macs.
I suppose you might run into issues with third-party devices or updated drivers/software, but that’s true all around. I’ll forgo that minor inconvenience for much a cheaper Mac.
Sorry, that should be “I’ll accept that minor inconvenience...”
“Hospitals, defense forces, communications, utilities were all affected. People died. Worldwide, IT managers who committed to a dependence on Windows were terminated, no questions asked.”
And this is your *positive* scenario?
You sick weirdo.
I absolutely love your apocalyptic vision of the computing future, Chris. Quite entertaining reading about the “Black Death” and such, hehe. Maybe you could consider turning it into a book. Which I’ll turn into a movie script.
Beeblebrox - Obviously you can live without the style and innovation of Apple hardware, but you have to keep in mind you’re paying for support too (technical and hardware.)
They are, in the underinformed minds of many people. Just like some think an iPod is the “only” portable music player. Collective myopia exists for many products.
Oh, I could have said “portable MP3 player” because those same people are often clueless of the existence of different audio formats. Heck, my wife’s iPod doesn’t have any MP3 files on it.
Excellent article! I love the way you guys bring up stuff like this, because it not only gives food for thought, but forces us to look at implications of current actions as well.
Couple of comments:
“positive” referring to Apple as a company, not the world as a whole.
I totally agree with the problem of clones. many of the problem with Windows machines are not prolems with the OS (though those are abundant enought), but rather issues with inferior or conflicting hardware/drivers. The fact that Apple controls EVERYTHING inside of a new Mac gives them a level of QC that no computer running Windows can attain. Sony machines are some of the most complete as far as QC, and they are some of the only ones that don’t have hardware issues frequently. I think that if Apple limited who it licensed OS X to, and maintained a strict level of control over the parts that were run on its cloned machines, the clone problem might be limited. It might also be prudent of them to force the hardware manufacturers to shoulder some of the tech support issues for hardware and software. Anyway, thats just my two cents, and please, keep writing stuff like this!!
The question I have, about the Black Death scenario, is that I always thought that the main reason virus and work writers target Windows is the overwhelming market share and that from a technical perspective OS X is also vulnerable (though perhaps not to quite the same extent or in the same ways) should someone choose to target it. After all, Robert Morris’s worm, one of the first I recall, went after *nix systems. I admit to not following Mac’s as closely as I could and so if this perception is incorrect, please let me know.