Is Microsoft counting on Steve Jobs’ Obstinance?
Amid much hype and more than a little speculation, the results of the Zune release are in. The general take seems to be that the Zune did fairly well on the first day of release, rocketing all the way up to number two, and has fallen like a meteorite with each ensuing day on the market. That is overly optimistic; those that opined that the Zune’s original day on the market was successful are giving too much credit for the Zune coming in at number 2. The Zune as we will all recall was, massively hyped, artificially hip*, nicely featured and widely anticipated. So when the Zune rolled in at second place it should have been a huge letdown, much like if the season ending episode of Heroes finished behind a rerun of M*A*S*H*. It isn’t that M*A*S*H* wasn’t a good show but, like the iPod, it has been around for long enough that everyone who want to see it has seen the show. In short, the Zune’s introduction was an utter failure.
After initial trepidation at the release of the Zune, the fans of all things Apple can seize this moment to gloat. Covering the Zune with repeated shovelfuls of derision is the de facto response of the most smitten iPod fans while the rest of the digital music market has simply forgotten the seemingly failed experiment.
At this point it would be easy to say that the Zune has entered a digital death spiral, that the whole thing was right up there with Microsoft Bob on the big list of bad Microsoft ideas. That notion gives Microsoft far too little credit. Sure, the company is over managed with a bureaucracy that flattens the smallest nail head but it is also the company that just won’t give up. Microsoft is a lot like a wrestler in an “I quit” match with the outcome in his favor. No matter how many choke holds, arm bars or number of times he is pounded like a tent pole with a chair the guy won’t give up, the book says he must win after all. For a case study of Microsoft’s tenacity recall the fate of Netscape, Microsoft doesn’t quit, they win.
Still, this setback must sting. In fact, the more schadenfreude filled among us are undoubtedly imagining the halls of Microsoft filled with the sounds of wailing at the companies abject failure to capture a significant part of the .mp3 market. Microsoft will keep trying but there is bound to be more than little depression right? Doubtful. Microsoft is not staffed by pie in the sky by dreamers but by realists. The early results of the Zune were no doubt anticipated and prepared for. Microsoft bought name recognition and, subtly, laid the groundwork for a crafty counter attack.
Microsoft’s leaves over the punji stick lined pit of doom? Why the largely derided agreement to pony up a dollar to Universal for every Zune sold of course! The move was (predictably) derided by the most muddle headed minds in the blogosphere . Such trivially obsessed knuckleheads saw the agreement as an affront to decent non-music stealing.mp3 player users everywhere. Microsoft sees the move differently. To Microsoft it wasn’t a supplication before the might of Universal, rather it was a dollar per unit well spent to force the hand of Steve Jobs.
What does Microsoft paying extortion to Universal have to do with Steve Jobs? Recall that Steve Jobs is well known for his stubbornness. Witness the fiasco that was the Apple III, a fiasco that came about in no small part because of Steve Jobs’ obstinate refusal to allow engineers to put a sorely needed fan in the machine. Note the fact that it took over five years after Steve’s return for Apple to release the Mighty Mouse and finally realize that Steve has told music companies to go pound sand on more than one occasion. Steve Jobs decides what is right and then refuses to move. This behavior, this inflexibility will play right into Microsoft’s hands/
The way is clear. When Universal begins renegotiation with Apple in early 2007 Universal will want the Microsoft deal. No really, Universal is going to ask for a little something something for each iPod sold. If it sounds crazy remember that to Universal every song downloaded is a stolen sale, thus every iPod sold where they don’t get a cut will now be, by the companies twisted logic, lost revenue that Universal deserves. Steve will say “f*** off” (Jon Gruber has a pretty spiffy imagining of the events, he goes a long way to reach a joke The Rock could convey in a few phrases but it is very well worth reading). Universal, being the money obsessed, no value added collective group of slimy slugs they are might grow a backbone for a moment, stop suing little Timmy and pull its content from iTunes.
Other publishers will follow suit and, low and behold, soon Microsoft and those that use the suddenly archaic Plays for Sure** will be the only game in town with legal music people want to buy. That scenario will put a dagger in the iTunes part of the iTunes iPod team.
Or maybe not. What Microsoft is forgetting, what the studios seem to be blissfully unaware of, is that iTunes doesn’t sell music or iPods. Apple might tell everyone iTunes sells iPods and consumers might think iTunes sells tracks and TV shows but they are mistaken. iTunes sells convenience. Even if Microsoft’s rosiest dreams came true and the only songs left on iTunes were hits of the eighties by Limozeen the situation won’t improve for the Zune. First Zune has the befuddling pricing scheme and that is coupled with a software experience that seems to be everything iTunes is not. Therefore, it is easy to conclude that without the huge iTunes library Apple might sell a few less iPods but Microsoft won’t sell any extra Zunes. As a corollary Universal won’t sell any extra tracks but one can be sure the use of P2P programs will rise by an amount proportional to the drop in iTunes sales.
If Universal ends up rebuffing Apple’s offer of “nothing” when the contract talks roll around and cite Microsoft as the way things should be done you’ll hear a lot about the end of the iPod and a fiery Zune being reborn from the ashes. Like the Phoenix, it will be just another myth.
Note to Microsoft: “Welcome to teh socia1” is hipper than “Welcome to the social”
Plays for Sure: Now with less than 1 in 4 chances of actually playing!

Comments
Ugh… Ok, MS made the deal but merely shuffled the money that was paid by Novell to get MS press for letting the lion into the sheep field. Novell paid MS $40mil, MS paid universal the $40mil (I see guys in old Ford LTD’s with bad mustaches and hair wearing 20 year old wool suits in mustard and brown colors doing this) BECAUSE Apple’s contracts were coming up and they knew it. They WANT universal to ask Apple for the money. They want to see Apple pay someone all the duckets their making from it. Basically starve Apple into either 1) Raise the price of the iPod or 2) Raise the price of the music that makes the Zune look more appealing to consumers.
I’m sure what Apple and Co. will do going into this contract negotiation is show them the numbers. Show how much Universal has made from iTunes each year. And if that doesn’t work, charge universal a fee for setting up thier artists on iTunes and basically give it back.
There are ways around it. But basically MS had to pay off the Music companys because there bringing in an unproven service and Universal KNOWS MS systems and generally hacked one way or another and there covering expected losses.
I’m not seeing Universal trying to pull its content. Jobs can point out the following: “Without iTunes people will still fill their iPods with content. They just won’t be paying for it anymore and you will lose out on ANY reimbursement. Additionally they will go to illegal places to get them free and you won’t be able to pull a dime.”
Remember, the RIAA has been getting hit for legal fees from their lawsuits being dismissed for lack of real evidence. The fact that their tactics of bullying are starting to fail against average people means they are pretty hosed against Apple.
I just read that Norah Jones music is/will be selling in un-DRMed MP3 format over at Yahoo because kids don’t want to buy it if they can’t load it on their iPods.
So much for Universal muscling Apple into giving them a cut of iPod revenues.
What a bunch of nonsense. Let me demonstrate what a harebrained article this is with a simple comparison.
iPod owns the great majority of the MP3 player market. Universal ‘pulling out’ of this market because they can’t extort a dollar per unit would be like pulling all their CD sales out of Walmart: it’s NOT going to happen. If they threaten this it will obviously be an empty threat and Apple will simply ignore it without consequence.
And the idea that the other publishers will ‘follow suit’ is even more preposterous. Can you imagine all record companies refusing to sell CDs at Walmart? They might as well threaten to declare bankruptcy. Or even better: threaten to hold their breath until Steve Jobs gives in.
WAKE UP AND SMELL REALITY. Apple is holding all the cards, here, on the next generation music sales playing field. Microsoft holds exactly none. This is why Microsoft was forced to bend over while Apple will continue to whistle happily along at .99 cents a song.
You’re right about SJ being stubborn and why MS did what they did but they are working a game plan from 1992 and it won’t work here. Even Morris in his last comments says it’s an experiment and it’d be nice to continue it - knowing full well SJ is not going to go for it.
a) Apple could start by pointing out that what’s next, why not car manufacturers charge you for gassing up every time or fridge makers everytime you open the door? What else are you using their thing for?
b) Clearly with the lower than calculated sale for ipod for online tracks, it’s PROVEN that consumers already know how to load non AAC Fairplay tracks on their ipod so what would a Universal pullout achieve? NOTHING. Consumers would continue to DL illegally or buy CD’s. Unless Universal is prepared to stop selling CD’s in the stores at the same, their bluff is NOTHING.
c) Who is going to win this PR battle? Universal? the Music Industry? Or the other side? SJ, Apple, musicians and the music consumer?
d) Steve Jobs heads Apple, Pixar and sits on the board of Disney - who is going to piss off SJ and who plans on staying in the entertainment industry?
MS cannot seem this because they think it’s 1992 and they can implement their embrace & extend game plan - only in this case, Apple is 100 times more because Apple has deliver some $300 million to Universal (guessing at their $1 cut for selling about 25% of all the itunes tracks sold so far) so Universal might talk big to the press, the reality is they are not walking away from that versus MS’s ONE MILLION dollar deal (what MS just announced they’ll by June 2007 - talk about low expectations ... Apple should be crossing the 120 million ipod by then)
The article says that Microsoft doesn’t quit - it wins. Sometimes, maybe. But I’m recalling when Microsoft decided they wanted to put Intuit out of business with Microsoft Money. They failed.
The thing is that people remember Microsoft’s successes and forget their failures.
With regard to Universal, my money is on Steve Jobs to prevail in any negotiations that happen.
Yawn… I guess Beeb already commented in the same way on a another article, but largely, the only place where I see plenty of talk about the ZUNE is… this place.
Also, the whole discussion is somewhat futile. Downloads may for some reason represent a kind of battleground, as at this point the leech.. the MI is trying out what it can do to an emerging market. But let us be realistic. Downloads are insignificant compared to physical media sales. And physical media are here to stay, for a long, long while. Because consumers, as stupid as they may appear at times, have a sense of value, and notice when they are being screwed over.
I just read that Norah Jones music is/will be selling in un-DRMed MP3 format over at Yahoo because kids don’t want to buy it if they can’t load it on their iPods.
And this isn’t some indie label. It’s BMI. And there are other artists available as well.
Frankly, if the big labels wanted to weaken Apple’s negotiation power, they’d do this across the board with every artist at every label. Any music you want from any store you want to play on your iPod.
Who is going to win this PR battle? Universal? the Music Industry? Or the other side? SJ, Apple, musicians and the music consumer?
Please, I appreciate that you guys love Apple’s monopoly in this area and root for Apple’s continued dominance, but do not put them in the same category as the “musicians and the music consumer.”
This fight is between these multi-billion dollar greedy corporations and Apple is in THAT category. The musicians still have to deal with the labels and the consumers can only buy what’s available to them, whether it’s Apple’s DRM-infested music or someone else’s.
Ok, seriously can you go somewhere else. In your last 100 posts you have put apple computer down. Go elsewhere.
In your last 100 posts you have put apple computer down. Go elsewhere.
Firstly, no.
Second, this site is an IRREVERENT look at Apple, which means that it theoretically welcomes critical views of Apple even if you don’t, or at the very least a step away from the worshipping press-release-regurgitating opinions that are indicative of most Apple fan sites.
Third, if you can’t handle non-worshipping non-press-release-regurgitating opinions about Apple, then maybe YOU should go elsewhere.
And last, I’ve made plenty of positive comments about Apple. They are great at industrial design, make a damned good music player, and nice software. I own two Macs (three if I could afford a Macbook Pro) and an iPod video player, as well as owning Apple’s Final Cut Studio and other Apple software.
But Apple is a giant greedy corporation like any other giant greedy corporation. If you don’t believe that, and I suspect you don’t, then you are a delusional fan boy incapable of HEARING any reasonably objective observations, let alone making them yourself. And I have about as much respect you telling me to go elsewhere as you do of facts or reality.
In other words, screw off. If you don’t like it, ignore me or don’t post here.
Oh, Ok… little out of line. Maybe on my part maybe a tad on yours. We’ll agree that we both have a +/- for Apple.
Buy a shot/beer/drink on my tab. We’ll table up later.
I was a little out of line… While you have to agree you’ve been posing as the devils advocate lately.
That should read “POSTING” ... Damn these imac keyboards…
While you have to agree you’ve been posting as the devils advocate lately.
I appreciate the conciliation, xwiredtva. But just to clarify, I don’t post as devil’s advocate. I post my genuine thoughts and feelings about Apple, for better or worse. And if you ask anyone here, they’ll tell you that I’ve done that since day one.
That said, most of my criticism is less at Apple than it is at fanboys who can’t take a whiff of criticism at Apple or who are blatantly hypocritical when criticizing MS+ or defending Apple, particularly when it comes to issues like monopolies and DRM.
Yes, true. But to create a monopoly for the customer surely would make someone think that the corporation at hand would think that the customer would appreciate the gesture let alone want to be part of said cult or at least want to be part of said culture.
Either way, I’d much rather be part of the culture that is right than the culture that is left.