iWork ‘08: Pages
iWork, Apple’s office suit has received a long awaited overhaul and has brought aboard a new Application, Numbers as an Excel competitor. How does it stack up compared to other Office Applications such as Microsoft Word, Excel and PowerPoint? Quite awesome actually. Here is part 1 (of 2) of my iWork ’08 review
While people use word processors to accomplish their needs whether they be pros or the casual users when it comes down to it we just only need the basics: the ability to type text. We can then manipulate it as we please which is one of the advantages of editing text digitally.
While I am sure you are familiar with most word processors under the sun from Text Edit to Microsoft Office. However are needs vary and as a casual user I my only requirement is being able to type and format text how I see fit. I don’t need to pay extra for features I will never use let alone know about.
The main reason has been finding what capabilities Microsoft Word has, it was cluttered and confusing. In addition I needed something fast and simple as my main Mac is an aging iBook G3, Text Edit fit the bill. But then I was turned on to iWork and decided to give it a test drive, Apple was providing a free 30 day trial so I had nothing to lose. My experience so far has been above satisfactory.
Pages
I am new to the entire iWork suite but have dabbled in Microsoft Office. One of the biggest advantages in making the switch is the huge increase in speed and simplicity. Even on my old iBook iWork runs much, much faster than Microsoft Office.
In addition learning most of the features of Pages is relatively simple and straightforward as the default toolbar contains most of them. While I won’t drill down on the features Apple lists I will go down on some of the more important items and the overall user experience.
Formats
One of the most important things when it comes to cross platform compatibility is which format will work the best. There is no such thing as a universal format for anything as sacrifices had to be made and features adjusted. But we can get pretty close to flawless integration. However Pages really loves to keep in the .Pages format with no way to set a default option such as .Doc or .Rtf but you do have the option to export.
While pages can natively read and write Microsoft Office documents you don’t have much of a say in how your file comes out. You have the option of .Doc, .Rtf, .PDF and .Pages and plain text, compared to other editors this is a minimal selection but still good enough for the average user.
However if you are dealing with cross platform compatibility you might choose a PDF document or Microsoft Word Document, you lose most of your format in Plain Text (obviously) and in Rich Text Formatting.
But there is one feature that Microsoft Office 2007 users will appreciate and that is Open XML compatibility. Here is the real kicker, Apple was able to release this a full 4 months before Microsoft 2008 ships. Your only alternative is a beta converter which is a half baked solution.
Use
Besides the usual function of typing up School assignments I tend to write up Blog posts offline so I always have an archived copy and that I am not too fond of using a Web Browser to edit massive posts either (I learned the hard way).
Nonetheless I need to keep track of links and tidbits of information easily and have it readily available. This is where Tracking and Comments come in. They are both straightforward in what they do
If I were to highlight the paragraph above I could add a comment on how much I love the Comments feature and link to the iWork ‘08 page on Apple’s Web Site. I could even add in a URL that will take me there via Safari.
With tracking I can see what changes have been made and can initiate it any time. If I accidentally delete a paragraph of text I needed or find out I need it later it is always there, right where I left it. It works much the same way comments does in that it shows up in the side bar and that I can delete certain changes.
The Interface
Like I said, everything is straightforward in Pages and I am still getting ahold of everything. The layout and orientation of objects such as the toolbar and sidebar is an extreme change but not so foreign that you won’t learn quickly. I love that iWork can handle templates and how you can customize your own or download templates from the Web.
I’d have to say that for the casual user such as myself who does not want to drown in a sea of features iWork provides an easy escape while maintaining a strong stance on function.
Comments
Does it have grammar checking? That is a key ingredient I would be willing to pay for. Granted it is better to know my grammar than to have some application remind me that mine is poor; however, grammar checking comes in handy now and then.
Was it poor editing, or did Pages cause the duplication in the article above?
Now why don’t I like that Open XML thing…
Something went wrong with this article, by the way.
Pages 08 has a function called Proofreader. It checks for things like capitalization after periods and question marks, double spaces between words, and will flag jargon and complex words ... but I don’t think it’s actually doing grammar checking.
While I like Pages 06 I still spend a lot of time in Word. The first thing I do when installing Word on a computer is to se up customized toolbars and getting rid of the standard ones. That way I have everything I need and it’s exactly where I expect it to be.
Auto correct is another important feature for me. For example, I use qqq for Australia and qqqw for Australian. Hopefully Pages 08 includes this feature.
> Does it have grammar checking?
- Does it check grammar? [Avoid the present continuous]
> That is a key ingredient I would be willing to pay for.
- That is a key ingredient for which I would be willing to pay. [Avoid placing a preposition at the end of a clause]
> Granted it is better to know my grammar than to have some application remind me that mine is poor; however, grammar checking comes in handy now and then.
- Granted, it is better to know the correct grammar rather than to rely upon an application, which reminds me that my level is poor; however, on occasion, a grammar checker is useful. [Avoid informal and slang English in writing]
I am always surprised at the number of native English speakers who do not know the structure of their own language.
de Villiers
Cheeky, de Villiers!
Though I do disagree.
1) “grammar checking” is a function of the application. In this case, “checking” is a gerund. So “grammar checking” is a compound noun, rather than a noun & verb.
2) A preposition at the end of a sentence is acceptable when avoiding it makes the sentence more convoluted. Eg your example.
3) Your example changes the meaning of what the author of the comment intended. My only change would be to replace “; however” with a comma.
The most important rule of writing is “write in a style appropriate for the medium or market”.
Comments on forums are generally made in language much closer to spoken language. It helps keeps things more “warm and fuzzy”. On forums “informal and slang” are common and acceptable methods of writing.
I’m assuming you were tongue-in-cheek, and my comments are also sent with a cheeky grin.
yetsirah, Pages does have grammar checking. Apple has called it Proofreading.
I’m very inclined to say that all the people that are pointing out the grammar issues are hired by Apple to persaude us towards iWork ‘08 and the new keyboard.
but then again my tin foil hat is solar powered…
> I’m assuming you were tongue-in-cheek, and my comments are also sent with a cheeky grin.
Well, it was more a combination of French superiority and low (but gentle) humour! The French superiority may be more assumed than real.
Nevertheless, I am genuinely surprised at how frequently English native speakers do not know the structure of their own language. In France, every student is taught the entire grammatical structure of the language.
As a country, we might take to the streets a little too often - but at least the street banners are expressed correctly.
Your problems with English - it is something, certainly, up with which you should not put!
de Villiers
“A preposition at the end of a sentence is acceptable”
You could have stopped right there. The whole preposition thing died with debutantes and horseless carriages. Who gives a crap about prepositions at the end of sentences beyond anal retentive grammar police and librarians?
I’m no lawyer, but if you were speaking with friends and you said, “For what are we waiting?” instead of “What are we waiting for?” I’m pretty sure they have a legal right to beat the snot out of you.
Btw, I really like the new Pages. The addition of ACTUAL word processing instead of the page layout that Apple fanboys pretended was some kind of substitute for word processing is a welcome change.
And I love the templates, which is where Apple’s design team really excels far beyond the competition.
> You could have stopped right there. The whole preposition thing died with debutantes and horseless carriages. Who gives a crap about prepositions at the end of sentences beyond anal retentive grammar police and librarians?
> I’m no lawyer, but if you were speaking with friends and you said, “For what are we waiting?” instead of “What are we waiting for?” I’m pretty sure they have a legal right to beat the snot out of you.
La vulgarité Américaine typique.
However, I look forward to using Pages.
“La vulgarité Américaine typique.”
And proud of it, you anal-retentive stuck-up French stereotype.
Si vous voulez.
[La vulgarité, la crudité; we tend not to be proud of such behaviour. When we use insults, we try to avoid those that are lacking in grâce, charme, finesse. It’s all a bit basique and élémentaire. #
It is one of the benefits of the mastery of one’s language.]