Memo to Steve Jobs: 7 Reasons to Decouple OS X from Apple Hardware Now
Dear Steve,
I have to admit it is a little strange writing to you. So many of us in the broader Apple family feel like we know you. We have watched your keynotes for years (for some of us, a lifetime!). We have watched you grow Apple only to be thrown out, only to come back and save the company from what seemed like a certain demise. And now, some of us are watching now and see what could be a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity that you simply cannot pass up on.
The storied history of Apple and Microsoft is a fascinating one, as you know, Steve. What has happened in essence is two business models, or approaches as to how to make money and how to create the greatest experience in the marketplace. With Microsoft’s well over 90 percent lockdown on the usage of GUI operating systems I think you would agree that they have won. And I think you would also agree that Apple’s operating system is a superior user experience, albeit one that gets more and more obfuscated as time goes on, and Microsoft catches up.
Steve, your switch to the Intel processor was a ballsy one. Many of the Mac faithful were shocked after spending years ingesting, and regurgitating, the now-proven myth that the Power PC platform was a better one than the Intel one (remember the snails?). But what I am suggesting is a far ballsier move, one that is somewhat an inversion, or reverse of the Apple business model, but one, I believe, that will take Apple to new heights, in stock price and marketshare.
As you know, Microsoft decided a long time ago to not be in the hardware business (at least for computers, you’d think they learn to not do silly things like put out the craptacular Zune!). Microsoft makes its money selling its operating system to hardware manufacturers. Back in the day Apple prided itself not only on its operating system, but also its hardware. Apple was an innovator, bringing to the market superior hardware. Things like SCSI (chain issues notwithstanding), ethernet, firewire, and much much more. 10 years ago an Apple computer was significantly different from a PC. Its processor was different. Its motherboard architecture was different.
But Macs now are very similar to PCs. Take a Mac and put it next to a Dell and, the horrific gap in industrial design aside, they share the same processor, the same drive hardware, the same networking, USB 2.0. The same wireless protocols (airport and bluetooth). In fact, they are remarkably similar machines.
This similarity has led to many Windows users buying Macs, knowing that they can not only experience the superior OS X experience, but that they can also run Windows machines without virtualization should they need to.
All this really leaves me scratching my head. Why does Apple continue to require an Apple piece of hardware to run OS X? It doesn’t make any sense! So, after that somewhat verbose introduction, Steve, I give you the 10 reasons why you must decouple OS X from Apple hardware now.
1. There has never been a better time
Steve, I love your new commercials. The ones smashing Vista are particularly brilliant. Vista sucks. You know it, and we do too. What is happening right now is that Microsoft is admitting that XP is outdated, and their answer, Vista, is a failure. You are wise to pick up on this and to start pointing OS X out to consumers. But the time to really strike is now. And striking by expecting people who are comfortable going to Best Buy or buying directly from Dell requires a change in strategy.
2. Dell wants you
Let’s face it. Dell is a force to be reckoned with. Yes, their Dude, get a Dell campaign was stupid. Yes, the majority of their hardware is ugly and the antithesis of everything that is brilliant about Ives. But they sure know how to sell a boatload of hardware. Dell was locked into Windows, but now they sell Linux machines! Don’t view Dell as ugly machines. View Dell as incredible channels for OS X. Look at it this way. You are syndicating the Apple experience to other platforms. When HBO releases an incredible series (or maybe I should use a favorite of yours, The Office) they don’t demand that it only be consumed on a certain make of television! Same with OS X. Let Dell sell it and they will sell tons.
3. Hardware doesn’t really matter, or most people don’t get good design
I already covered above how the difference between Apple and PC hardware is minimal, and probably nonexistent. The other thing you have to understand, Steve, is that the vast majority of people don’t get good design. After all, they use Windows, drive Asstecs, and do other unsavory things. Now, you could say that Apple is like Porsche, or BMW, as some others have said, and is happy with low marketshare. But I can’t believe you think this way and are stubborn enough to not try to change the world. Indeed, syndicating OS X to other manufacturers could really bring good design to the masses. After all, people spend all day staring at their screen, and not the boxes that run their screens. Even so, the vast majority of computer users won’t care that they are using a better looking operating system than Windows. But, if it is offered at Dell, and it has better security and features, they will buy it. So sell it.
4. You will make much more money
There, got your attention, didn’t I? Some out there go on and on about how Apple is a hardware company and would never license OS X because you would lose money. Funny, didn’t work out for Microsoft that way and the last time I checked Bill has a lot more money in the bank than you. Plus, I’m not suggesting you stop making Macs. Indeed, because you will be the maker of both the operating system and hardware you will still be uniquely positioned to create hardware and software experiences that will rock our world. And many computer users, including me, will see that difference and continue buying Macs. But for those Dell and HP users out there who want to save a buck, or don’t care about Apple’s design, they will still be putting money in your pocket instead of Bill’s. The marketplace has already proven that Apple’s marketshare will always be a minority, and while you have made great strides recently let’s be honest. They are in the low percentages (and that is at the high end) and more often in the decimals of percentages. That is no way to grow.
5. The world is leaving you behind or China
To the vast majority of the world a computer is a PC running Windows. This is a shame. Sure there are niches overseas but they are all in developed countries. Go to India, which is going through a huge economic transformation, and you won’t see Macs. Go to China? Forget it. Same with Africa. Again, if OS X could run on any hardware, including the cheap stuff, people who would otherwise never be exposed to Apple would use it.
6. Scale
Open up OS X and you don’t have to get into silly negotiations with people like Best Buy who, every six months it seems, are either selling Macs or aren’t. And when they are there is usually one or two out there that is largely ignored. But with OS X running on any hardware suddenly Best Buy, Circuit City, Radio Shack, and any brick-and-mortars outlet is a channel for Apple. This is huge. Add Dell to the mix and it gets really big. This is scale, and by continuing to bundle things you cannot match this out in the marketplace.
7. It’s better for the end-user
Personally I care more about OS X than I do about the hardware it runs on. If I had to choose between running Windows on a Mac, and Mac on a PC, well, I’d choose the latter. Don’t get me wrong, I love your hardware. Love it so much that I have never owned a PC, and will never bring one into my home! But, what really matters to me is OS X.


Comments
Don’t do it Steve!
Show your true face, Gates!! Stop hiding behind the moniker of Hedley Stern!!!
Frankly, this is a pretty stupid and oft-repeated theory. It’s got no substance in it. If Apple starts licensing OS X, people will stop buying Macs. I will too. So, one end of the business is gone.
Second, yes, OS X’s penetration will increase. But by how much. Wish Microsoft one on end of the spectrum defending their territory and having good relations with all the major PC vendors, I’m not too sure about Apple’s chances in that market.
Plus, once OS X gets licensed to run on normal PCs, there remains no difference between them and Macs. And Apple will lose its brand image and cult.
I think it makes absolutely no sense for Apple to license Mac OS X and I am hundred percent sure Steve Jobs will never ever think of doing so.
Don’t mind, but I do think that it is just wishful thinking on your part so that you can get your hands on Mac OS X without spending as much bucks in future. Not happening, mate.
I think we would be happy if Apple licenses OS X under strictly limited conditions ,for instance ,mini-notebook like Panasonic.
From the business side, I’m not sure - Cool n Casual may be right.
As a consumer though, I would love for this to happen. I actually prefer hardware other than Apple (Thinkpads) but I would love to run Mac OS X on them along with something like Linux.
Wow… I never expected to see a half-baked article like this on here. Most true Mac devotees seem to “get” Apple’s philosophy of making the whole widget and that’s the lion’s share of why their products just work. It’s not by accident, it’s the tight control of the entire system. Mac OS X would not be the same on generic hardware, despite the similarities between Mac and PC hardware. There are too many unknown variables and it introduces many of the same issues that Windows faces.
Oh and the line about making more money, “now I’ve got your attention,” is cute but silly. If that were all it was about, Apple would have sold out years ago. It’s about making a good product, start to finish.
In my opinion Licensing is the worst thing Apple could possibly do for the consumer. I like knowing if something goes wrong, I’m not going to get bounced between software and hardware vendors. I sincerely hope Steve reads and dismisses this and the thousands of other articles with the same tired arguments as quickly as I did.
I’m certainly not flaming you for your opinion, you have a right to it, but I guess I kinda wish you really understood why your Mac is a Mac… it’s not just the software, it’s not the hardware. The Mac is more than the sum of its parts and that’s why they’re so awesome.
Argh. Oh how I would love to enjoy the privilege of running OS X on what Apple doesn’t supply. To run it on overly expensive ultraportables and UMPCs with their shoddy battery-life. To run it on cheap, ugly hardware. Ah, the delight. Seriously, I can see the appeal of cheap hardware. Personally, I long ago decided that I simply cannot afford to buy cheap. I would rather forgo a purchase that is not absolutely essential than suffer from getting what I paid for. Realistically, Apple’s hardware is already much, MUCH cheaper than it used to be, and no longer of the same quality as it still was say in the late 90s, yet it is still of good value. Nevertheless, running OS X on the truly cheap silicone available these days… it invokes the feeling of taking the prom queen out to the dirtiest diner in town. If she truly loves you she will come along, but deep in your heart both of you will know that you deserve better than plastic cutlery. Apple’s mantra is control of the product, top to bottom, to ensure the intended consumer experience. If you allow OS X to run on anything, that will no longer be a given, and the experience will suffer, as well as the poor support techs facing a tidal wave of “Help, the no-name card X I bought used for 30 cents won’t work!” inquiries. It would also raise the price of the OS and bring along the obnoxious copy protection measures known from Windows. Piracy would become a more serious issue, as all those people in developing countries who could not afford a new computer if they starved themselves for years would sure be happy to shell out big for an OS license. Even if it was the 3 dollar 3rd world version. Steve just stressed that Apple is a “software company”, so we may always be in for a surprise. But honestly, I don’t think so. As much good as it might do for the world in general, it does not match Apple’s profile.
1. There has never been a worse time! With Mac sales growing 3 to 5 times faster than PCs it would be difficult to justify throwing away this very profitable growth.
2. The only people that care what Dell wants are the 8,000 that are being laid off. With horrid (for me) customer support from India there is no better company around to screw up OS X’s reputation.
3. Design does matter as the iPod and iPhone clearly show. We’re also talking about the integration of both hardware and software design.
4. Actually I think they will make less money. The real profit will always be on the hardware side and it is that side that pays for OS X development. Now that might change if Apple was to put OS X on the market at the same price points as Vista - but then Mac users would be really screwed because Leopard would not be available to us at $129 retail. Yep, I guess that Apple would be happy with a $499 price for a full version with all of the security controls to avoid pirated copies. We, however, would not.
6. Look at Mac’s sales increases year over year. It’s profitable, Apple has a lot of cash in the bank and they are able to provide first rate customer service to users who actually buy the hardware. I guess that if OS X was available on PCs Apple could provide customer service to those users from India, who would be happy to take care of the cheap PC world for part of the increased price of OS X.
7. It’s better for the consumer for Apple to stick with the Mac/OS X route. Again, look at a need to change price points if OS X is set free, huge problems with customer service levels for Bubba who buys a cheap PC with crap parts, etc.
While you may want a cheaper alternative to Macs you sure are not going to want the misery it would bring - like support from India.
You also need to take a look at how Mac sales have paid for OS X development and how far that has brought the OS. Compared to the position where Apple was before Steve J returned (when Apple did license their OS to other hardware makers) the OS X/Mac combination has been a winner. I would hate to see that end, but maybe we’ll see it after Steve J retires.
Hadley, when did you start writing for PC World?
; )
A year ago I did a little math to see if Apple could switch to being a software compnay. I used actual Apple financial reports to determine just how much profit they make on their hardware. I then took that number and divided it by the wholesale cost of OEM copies of Windows. Retail sales of Windows are insignificant compared with the OEM numbers.
That little examination ignored huge factors like the fact that large portions of the wholesale price aren’t profit for Apple, the fact that Dell and HP pay even less per copy, the enormous increase in development and testing needed to support every brand of PC hardware and prevent widespread piracy, and the really big factor: what Microsoft would do in retaliation.
I was being extremely generous to the software side of the equation, but the results were still clear. Using those figures Apple would have to sell EIGHT TIMES as many OEM copies of OS X as they currently ship with their own hardware to make the same profit. Factor in all those ignored factors and the actual figure probably rises to somewhere between 10 an 15 times.
If Apple were to switch to being a software company they would have to gain a 30-50% market share almost immediately just to maintain their current profitability.
Nobody at Apple is that stupid.
While it’s true that both Mac and Windows systems run on the same Intel motherboards, much of the standards and technology included on that motherboard were in part popularized by Apple hardware.
The same influence can be seen thought the entire gamut of computer hardware today. Apple has consistently been a driving force the market in regards adopting new technology and even PC form factor design. This includes USB, Firewire and, most recently, WiFi. Mac laptops were the first to have built in Wi-Fi and drove the adoption of wireless networking into the mainstream. Before that, Apple had significant influence in popularizing the entire concept of laptops in general.
And the only company even remotely close to Apple’s ascetics and usability is Sony. While they have been successful with their laptop products, they completely missed the boat when it comes to portable music players. The rest of the market simply doesn’t have the vision required to push the envelope.
While it may appear that we’ve reached a point where hardware innovation doesn’t matter, you can be sure someone made the same observation in the last few decades. Instead, I’m predicting the is plenty of room for future hardware innovation for Apple. And the line between computers and devices is staring to blur. This trend gives Apple a huge advantage over companies like Microsoft and even Sony.
Shutting down Apple’s computer hardware division would cause the computer hardware industry to slow down significantly. We’d be at the mercy of a complacent market who really doesn’t have a clue to create technology that people actually want to use.
I would rather forgo a purchase that is not absolutely essential than suffer from getting what I paid for.
Never a beaver constructed a truer sentence.
One of the attractions of the Mac platform is the simplicity of the buying experience. I recently tried to buy a Dell for work. (now ex-work.) It was astonishing how difficult it was to find a model of the right spec. I spent a while trying to get one specced out over the phone to - yes - india and the person kept telling me about deals on things I wasn’t interested in. The entire thing was unbelievably confusing.
Lose the specific hardware for the software and you kill, in its entirety, what is special about Apple, and what makes it important.
MacGlee,
They did: G4 Cube (Commercial failure.)
1.Why Apple needs Macs? Reliability that’s why! Apple controls the hardware and the software design making one work with the other. No other company does that and that’s why Macs are far more reliable and stable than any PC period. 2. Who gives a damn about Dell!
They were bragging before let them eat dirt. There hardware is crap! 3.See answer for question 1. why hardware does matter big time! 4.Money is not everything and how does one make more money when there product goes to hell when there are to many chefs in the kitchen? 5.The World is what? Take a look at Apple’s stock, then take a look at Dell’s stock. Who’s leaving who behind? Stupid reason.
6.Scale of what? Making bad hardware try to work with OSX? Again answer 1. answers this stupid reason as well. 7.Better for the end user? I don’t think so. Having a bunch of crappy PC vendors make crap and then Apple has to try and make OSX run on it like it does with there current hardware. I will tell you right now, IT WON’T WORK!!