Stromatolites and the Death of the Die Hard Mac Fan
If you ever make it to Australia, and you should, the first thing you should do is say "Hi" to Chris Howard. The second thing you should do is visit Shark Bay. There, in the overly salted waters you'll find stromatolites. They aren't good for eating or even interesting to watch (at best they look like a super slow mo Alka Seltzer that never dissolves) but they can tell you a lot about Mac fanatics.
Mac fanatics are a dying breed. 10 or even 5 years ago you could meet a fellow mac user and send semi secret signals back and forth. Ten years ago you could talk about what you had in your control strip. What? You don't remember the control strip? It was this little thing you had at the bottom of the Mac OS screen with... well never mind. You might also slip easily into a conversation about what to do while your Mac was burning a CD because Pre OS X the Mac could really only do one thing at a time. Five years ago you could talk about repairing permissions and complain about having to run programs in classic and wonder when Adobe was going to get Photoshop OS X native.To a PC user listening to the conversation it would all be so arcane as to be indecipherable, a secret language reserved for hard core Mac users.
All that has changed. Now it seems that there are two kinds of computer users, those that already have a Mac and those that are planning on getting one. That is a little overstated but the fact remains that more Macs are in use than ever before and the platform keeps on growing. The machines aren't strictly the purview of the die hards anymore, everyone has had at least a passing moment with a Mac and a huge chunk of Mac users aren't interested in the arcane goings on inside the Mac, they just want to use a computer.
This is where it gets interesting. The hardcore Mac users, the Mac evangelists were telling anyone who would listen that Macs have always been better. When Windows 98 came out, Macs were better. When Windows ME came out, Macs were better (which is kind of true, Macs were better than Windows ME but not better than 98). When XP came out they screamed Macs were better. The Mac faithful loudly opined Macs were better the whole time often without any basis in fact. When 10.1 became the default OS they said Macs were better. Sure Macs couldn't scan or reliably print but they passionately believed anything Apple did was better so they spouted spurious arguments (start up time) or purely manufactured reasons (anyone can use one) why the Mac was better and blasted those reasons at bullhorn volume across the internet. You could have dropped a load of pre composted cow manure in front of them, slapped an LCD on it and given the whole mess a keyboard with three keys and as long as one of the components had a rainbow Apple icon on it Mac fans would have come up with a reason why it was better. Likely along the lines of “The new ManureMac doesn't have that plasticky smell associated with PCs.”
In retrospect some of the arguments do seem ridiculous (I plead guilty to making a lot of the worst ones) but it is a mistake to just laugh at the fanatics. The Macolytes had a profoundly positive effect on the computing landscape. It kept the Mac going even when it wasn't better. Those who loved the Mac weren't numerous enough to improve the market share but they were loud enough to keep the Mac viable. There were versions of Flash for the Mac even when it didn't make sense. Versions of RealPlayer for the Mac even when it didn't make sense. The fact that the Mac survived had as much to do with how vehemently faithful protested against any perceived slight as it did with how good the Mac was. All that indignation, all that lobbying paid off. It allowed Apple to regain solvency and let Steve Jobs return to a company with a chance at success. It allowed the massive switch of the Classic OS to OS X to happen much more smoothly than anyone thought possible.
Then something unexpected happened. In the new environment Apple didn't need the lobbyists and the fanboys. Apple kept making OS X better, Apple released the iPod and the iTunes store, and finally Apple unleashed the iPhone. These things, which would have never been possible without the rabid loyalty of Mac users, took Apple from a niche player to a major tech giant. From a company that went against the grain to a company that set the standard. Don't believe it? Everyone is trying to make an iPhone killer, people are still trying to come up with an iPod killer and computer companies are trying desperately to match Apple's industrial design. Which bring us back to the stromatolites of Shark bay. The interesting thing about stromatolites is that they take in water molecules and excrete Oxygen. They do this all the time, without thinking. It turns out, if you're big fan of stromatolites, that this is a pretty big mistake at least over the long run.
Billions of years ago these things were everywhere but the constant respirations of the stromatolites changed the atmosphere to a relatively oxygen rich environment. The abundance of oxygen paved the way for more complex organisms. The new organisms were hungry and when they felt a bit peckish they ate the stromatolites. Without ever realizing it, stromatolites have more in common with rocks than rocket scientists, they were paving the way for their own eventual doom. The only reason they are still around is that the extra salty waters of Shark Bay keep the predators away.
The same thing has happened to the Mac Faithful but it happened much faster. The environment they created, thinking or not, produced a landscape where Apple could innovate and thrive. A popular Apple renders the hard core Mac partisan irrelevant, when everyone wants a Mac those who refuse to use anything else become just another user. They might have been laughed at when Apple was 'beleaguered” but they had loud voices and a lot of people listened in between snickers and guffaws. Now the pure Mac partisan can talk but his voice is drowned in a sea of more rational Mac users. Which, in the online Macaverse, is the same as being extinct.

Comments
I could have dropped what?
What is a stromatalite? Is it anything like a stromatolite?
The difference is subtle. See the stromatalite is just like a stromatolite except while neither started out life in a spell checker one was learned. THat is on me.
The article was truncated for some reason. Which I don’t think is on me. I’ve fixed it now. Maybe someone is trying to send me a message about article length.
Thanks RMAC
Excellent analysis Chris. Yes, I remember the old days. My first operating system was System 6 (6.0.4, to be exact). I was one of the ones who stood by Apple when one of my relatives told me to get a “real computer.” (By the way, he now owns a Mac.) I even bought a PowerMac 9600 during Apples most “beleaguered” time, 1997. I can revive all the fond memories, but I don’t really mind if the Mac Fanatic fades away. The market share is sufficient now that software companies take notice of Apple, and virtualization programs are needed less and less. I don’t feel like a second class citizen anymore. And I smile quietly, at last feeling vindicated.
Raycon,
I see we started about the same time. My first Mac ran 6.0.X (it was a Mac Classic, don’t remember the exact version). I bought a PowerBook 5300 (used) and a Quadra 660AV during the beleaguered years.
I concur, while I won’t miss the mac fanatics too much I do miss the passion they brought to the table.
I’d also like to apologize for the breakdown in the article earlier. As soon as I saw it I knew it was wrong. I’d catch that stuff earlier in most cases but it was a heavy day of posting at iPhoneMatters.
Oh and thanks for the kind words RayCon. Where were my manners?
I’m one of those late comers. I bought my first Mac two years ago; a MBP. I’ve known many Mac owners over the last twenty years and have played with many of their machines (no idea of the models). The thing, however, that stopped me from buying one earlier was the OS. It was just plain clunky. I started my computing life on the Amiga; a computer that had a pre-emptive multitasking OS that was so tightly tied to the hardware that it could do things that still blow me away today. So to move to a machine that could only do one thing at a time was not an option. I had to buy a wintel machine, as they could kind of multi-task. (I still call it my Dark Ages).
It wasn’t until I saw OS 10.3 on a friends G5 iMac that I was comfortable to switch. So when my wintel machine, running win2000 (Redmond’s best effort to date), finally succumbed to the weight of multiple virus and malware
protection programs and ground to a halt, I was in like Flynn. I haven’t looked back, haven’t used windows in two years, and haven’t missed it.
So, thank you to those die-hards who stuck by the Apple platform during its Dark Ages so that it could become what it is today. I just wish the same could’ve happened for the Amiga die-hards (now, there were a bunch of fanatics). An Amiga with continued development over he last 20 years would’ve been an awesome machine.
Mac fanatics are still around, and some of them hang out here, but they are a diminishing segment of the Mac user base. And that’s a good thing. A great thing. Macs are nice tools, but that’s all they are. They are not a life style. They don’t make you smarter. They don’t prove anything about you.
It was great fun to have been a Mac Evangelist, along with Guy Kawasaki, in the dark days of the 1990s. I met some great folks while attending Mac user groups in the late 80s because of a bunker mentality, and smaller numbers then the PC user groups.
It’s great now when someone at work tells you that they are dumping their old PC and buying a Mac and asking for your advice. Or, when asking your opinion on buying a new computer, they don’t give you the ‘what are you stupid or something’ look when you suggest they buy a Mac. At least they give it serious thought. All the hard work and perseverance of the early Mac users who stuck with the platform has paid off. I only wish I had been smart enough to have bought Apple stock during the days before they hired back Steve Jobs.
Good article. It is weird being in a group where when you try to promote the Mac you are joined by others agreeing and taking over your pitch.
Only thing is I don’t think stromatolites are the best analogy for things making themselves extinct. Having been around longer than any other living thing on the earth (at least 550 million years).