|
|
Total Posts: 1
Joined 2005-08-04
|
Posted: 18 September 2005 12:13 PM
You will still have those out there who don’t even know how to use a computer
|
|
|
Total Posts: 214
Joined 2005-09-12
|
Posted: 18 September 2005 12:37 PM
Shaun Thompson - Sep 18, 2005 12:13pm You will still have those out there who don’t even know how to use a computer
Although with a Mac, you’d have less. It makes more sense, since you don’t have to hit “Start” to shutdown on a Mac. That’s one thing Microsoft really needs to change for Vista (Yay, scenic vista ahead!). Who actually thought that was a good idea?
|
|
|
Total Posts: 1108
Joined 2005-03-16
|
Posted: 18 September 2005 05:29 PM
michaelstone - Sep 18, 2005 12:02pm Can I just ask Beeblebrox why he continues to come to the forums and Apple Matters if he seems to love Windows so much?
I love Apple too (although I certainly have my issues with Apple fanatics). I’ve said repeatedly that I like both platforms about the same, but the zealots can’t seem to comprehend this for some reason. For all the talk about Macs users being so creative and thinking “different”, I don’t think I’ve seen a more collectively sycophantic, unimaginitive, or obtuse group outside of politics.
|
|
|
Total Posts: 1574
Joined 2005-09-12
|
Posted: 18 September 2005 07:35 PM
I think that the world would be a more productive place if everyone had a mac.
|
|
|
Total Posts: 216
Joined 2005-09-19
|
Posted: 19 September 2005 07:09 PM
If everyone used Mac would the world be a better place? no, i guess no. The world would be nicer to the eye though, cos macintosh is focused (mostly) on graphic design. but better no.
|
|
|
Total Posts: 240
Joined 2005-08-06
|
Posted: 20 September 2005 11:33 PM
michaelstone - Sep 18, 2005 12:02pm Can I just ask Beeblebrox why he continues to come to the forums and Apple Matters if he seems to love Windows so much?
Oh! Be careful, don’t get him started!
You see michaelstone Beeblebrox loves Macintoshes and Wintels equally, and doesn’t want to pick favorites. He is like a mother with twins, even though one child is a genius and the other has special needs (prone to viruses and worms) They are not identical twins, obviously fraternal, the older one looks like Dad the other strangely enough looks like the pool boy. The sickly one, born a little later, is dyslexic and does everything upside down and backwards. He has a weight problem and tends to just stay in his room because he can’t walk without assistance. He looks up to his older brother and tries to be just like him, but he’s always a few years behind. He usually sits by the window staring at the vista making grandiose plans, but keeps procrastinating and nothing is ever accomplished.
And ‘brox bless his soul loves them equally.
|
|
|
Total Posts: 32
Joined 2005-09-12
|
Posted: 21 September 2005 12:13 AM
Beeblebrox - Sep 18, 2005 05:29pm but the zealots can’t seem to comprehend this for some reason. For all the talk about Macs users being so creative and thinking “different”, I don’t think I’ve seen a more collectively sycophantic, unimaginitive, or obtuse group outside of politics.
That goes for the windows zealots as well.
One thing you have to understand about Mac “zealots” is why they act that way. Mac users have been-and continue to be-spit-upon in the computer world. Most of us are treated as “dumb” for choosing a platform that is: “on the way out”, that is “slower”, and that has “no software available” for it. These are some of the multitudinous lies that have been spread for years. Now I do not condone immature name calling, or the “my computer can beat up yours” pissing matches that can happen in Mac vs. windows “discussions”, but when someone makes an errant statement about Macs (perhaps one that they heard from their IT friend), the kind thing to do is tell that person the truth.
Friends ask me all the time about up coming computer purchases, and I always ask them if they’ve considered the Mac. Part of this is because, I know that it works based on my experience (with both windows and Mac), and the other part is becuase I don’t want them coming to me to help them fix their computer if/when it breaks down. I know that most people (not all), are very good candidates for switching.
Zealotry happens in both camps. That’s why I always encourage people (Mac users included) to know what they are talking about before they make a statement or a decision - that is always the best course.
|
|
|
Total Posts: 1108
Joined 2005-03-16
|
Posted: 21 September 2005 03:25 AM
Grandpa Simpson - Sep 21, 2005 12:13am That goes for the windows zealots as well.
Yes it does.
Most of us are treated as “dumb” for choosing a platform that is: “on the way out”, that is “slower”, and that has “no software available” for it.
Yeah, like when they call them “sheep” and “drones”...no wait. That’s Mac users referring to Windows users.
These are some of the multitudinous lies that have been spread for years.
Yeah, like how Macs are way more stable than Windows and how Windows can’t do graphics, and how clock speed doesn’t mean anything because a 1.2 Ghz Mac will outperform a 3 Ghz Pentium. You mean lies like those?
Zealotry happens in both camps. That’s why I always encourage people (Mac users included) to know what they are talking about before they make a statement or a decision - that is always the best course.
I agree.
|
|
|
Total Posts: 9
Joined 2005-08-08
|
Posted: 21 September 2005 03:45 AM
Whoa sweet, i’m already registered in the forums
Hadley Stern - Sep 16, 2005 10:33am I often wonder this. Would the world be more efficient and more creative if everyone used Macs or does it matter? Chime in with you answers and explanations.
no.
for one thing, i would be rather disgrunted in having one of my favorite hobbies killed off--building and configuring computers. Just the other day I had great fun paper configuring a rig centered around a Geforce 7800GT (whether or not i have the montary basis to actually build such a rig is an entirely different story). I know i would be rather umm unhappy shall we say, if i was forced to buy a preconfigured mac.
secondly.. how can switching to OSX suddenly make my brain “more creative”? I’ve never really understood this.
third(ly) i’m pretty efficient as it is using windows. could I be more efficient in OSX? probably, but the most likely reason would be because I wont’ be eying that Farcry icon in the corner of my screen everytime I look up from my excel spreadsheet
|
|
|
Total Posts: 2
Joined 2005-09-21
|
Posted: 21 September 2005 04:29 AM
Wouldn’t there be more viruses targeted at Macs? I think the malevolent ones would try to hit the big guy.
|
|
|
Total Posts: 330
Joined 2005-09-13
|
Posted: 26 September 2005 05:12 AM
Hadley Stern - Sep 16, 2005 10:33am I often wonder this. Would the world be more efficient and more creative if everyone used Macs or does it matter? Chime in with you answers and explanations.
i suppose it depends on whether or not u actually endeavor to do work, much less creatively. i find the OS to be more easily navigated than windows is. iLife is suite and easy to use. i do believe that it and programs like it encourage people to take on projects that they wouldn’t otherwise have conceived of. ultimately however, Apple would have to have ways and means built into the apps to allow personal customization and template creation for it to be a truly creative environment. can i multitask like a fiend on my iBook compared to my 3.2Ghz windows Desktop? yes. windows in all it’s variations has been pretty poorly designed for allocating it’s resources for changing application needs. i.e.-try encoding a video on a windows machine and doing anything as basic as using a web browser becomes a task. this will change as the multicore x86 CPUs become more mainstream, however if Vista is the same as it’s ancestors, OS X will likely be more fluid on identical hardware than microsoft’s solution. will i buy Vista? probably not until i have to. until then i’ll have XP installed on my x86 Mac for my ritual frag sessions. but hey, i can dream that the x86 move might open doors for game development and playability on OS X right?
|
|
|
Total Posts: 216
Joined 2005-09-19
|
Posted: 30 September 2005 03:34 PM
HT technology goes fine, my 3.0ghz HT runs good while rendering video from Vegas5 while surfing
|
|
|
Total Posts: 330
Joined 2005-09-13
|
Posted: 30 September 2005 11:43 PM
xmno - Sep 30, 2005 03:34pm HT technology goes fine, my 3.0ghz HT runs good while rendering video from Vegas5 while surfing
yeh, the HT was a good move on intel’s part as was Moto’s use of it in the G4s, i believe it was labeled as multithreading. just curious, how much RAM do u have?
|
|
|
Total Posts: 216
Joined 2005-09-19
|
Posted: 30 September 2005 11:51 PM
triadone - Sep 30, 2005 11:43pm xmno - Sep 30, 2005 03:34pm HT technology goes fine, my 3.0ghz HT runs good while rendering video from Vegas5 while surfing
yeh, the HT was a good move on intel’s part as was Moto’s use of it in the G4s, i believe it was labeled as multithreading. just curious, how much RAM do u have?
well i have just 1024mb (2 512 kingston) on my intel. BTW intel chipsets and processors are good, i have nothing against them. mac should really use them (i know, i know they’re CISC not RISC). windoze sucks though.
|
|
|
Total Posts: 184
Joined 2005-09-11
|
Posted: 31 October 2005 12:27 AM
If everyone used Mac, hackers would aim their viruses to Macs, and the world would still be f***ed up.
*sighs* but it’s nice to dream.
|