Total Posts: 6
Joined 2005-10-30
|
Posted: 08 April 2006 02:22 PM
Was having a conversation about Macs on another forum and then all of a sudden a guy comes in and says:
Microsoft and OpenSource world inovate, not Apple.
I mean… what do I say in response to that?? *_*
And another guy - supposed scientist and Unix expert - says:
IMO Apple create a good OS, but more closed than MS stuff. Apple destroy UNIX spirit.
Should I even bother arguing with these people? I’m at a loss..
|
|
|
Total Posts: 714
Joined 2005-08-15
|
Posted: 08 April 2006 02:45 PM
First off, these people sound like Frankenstein! “Apple destroy UNIX spirit” LOL
Why do you feel the need to argue? You have your opinion. They have theirs.
It’s not anyone’s duty to defend Apple. If you dig it. Then just enjoy your Apple experience.
(IMHO)
|
|
|
Total Posts: 20
Joined 2006-03-28
|
Posted: 08 April 2006 03:20 PM
There’s a difference between having an opinion and being wrong…
|
|
|
Total Posts: 6
Joined 2005-10-30
|
Posted: 08 April 2006 05:56 PM
Yeah, it’s probably best to just avoid getting into an argument. I usually would, just there was someone asking for advice on buying a Mac and now this idiot came and started posting.
Meh… he’s just a brainwashed cretin. I won’t bother. I’ll just PM the guy who is asking for a Mac instead.
Thanks. I was kinda hoping you guys would be like, “wtf, someone dissin on our Apple?? C’mon boyz, let’s go show em who’s boss. kthnx.”
But oh well, advice on ignoring them is good too
-Luke
|
|
|
Total Posts: 1108
Joined 2005-03-16
|
Posted: 09 April 2006 05:45 PM
Luke Mildenhall-Ward - Apr 08, 2006 05:56pm Meh… he’s just a brainwashed cretin. I won’t bother.
Um, aren’t you the guy who said recently that Apple was the ONLY company right now that was innovating, or something similarly stupid.
What’s the difference between your dumbass comment and this guy’s?
|
|
|
Total Posts: 6
Joined 2005-10-30
|
Posted: 09 April 2006 08:26 PM
Beeblebrox - Apr 09, 2006 05:45pm Luke Mildenhall-Ward - Apr 08, 2006 05:56pm Meh… he’s just a brainwashed cretin. I won’t bother.
Um, aren’t you the guy who said recently that Apple was the ONLY company right now that was innovating, or something similarly stupid.
What’s the difference between your dumbass comment and this guy’s?
“the guy”? what, like, Neo or something?
No, it wasn’t me. You’ve probably confused me for someone else. But thanks for the input. If I had said that, then yes, I would be just as stupid as this guy.
|
|
|
Total Posts: 1108
Joined 2005-03-16
|
Posted: 09 April 2006 08:47 PM
Luke Mildenhall-Ward - Apr 09, 2006 08:26pm No, it wasn’t me. You’ve probably confused me for someone else. But thanks for the input. If I had said that, then yes, I would be just as stupid as this guy.
I’m pretty sure it was you. I’ll try and track down the exact quote.
UPDATE: Here’s the comment, “Apple are the only ones who have realized you do have to compromise on features for a better experience. “
As a bonus, I also found this, “I can’t believe people still expect Apple to let their Macs run Windows…” --By Luke Mildenhall-Ward on 2006 01 10
|
|
|
Total Posts: 6
Joined 2005-10-30
|
Posted: 09 April 2006 10:11 PM
Beeblebrox - Apr 09, 2006 08:47pm Luke Mildenhall-Ward - Apr 09, 2006 08:26pm No, it wasn’t me. You’ve probably confused me for someone else. But thanks for the input. If I had said that, then yes, I would be just as stupid as this guy.
I’m pretty sure it was you. I’ll try and track down the exact quote.
UPDATE: Here’s the comment, “Apple are the only ones who have realized you do have to compromise on features for a better experience. “
As a bonus, I also found this, “I can’t believe people still expect Apple to let their Macs run Windows…” --By Luke Mildenhall-Ward on 2006 01 10

You can post whichever of my comments you want. None of them are gonna say, “Apple are the only company who innovate.” That top quote is not even remotely close to the context of innovation.
C’mon Beeblobrox, don’t think you can fool anybody by posting things I’ve said which are completely different to your accusation
Although nice find on that bottom comment! I forgot I said that…
|
|
|
Total Posts: 1108
Joined 2005-03-16
|
Posted: 09 April 2006 11:29 PM
Luke Mildenhall-Ward - Apr 09, 2006 10:11pm C’mon Beeblobrox, don’t think you can fool anybody by posting things I’ve said which are completely different to your accusation 
I said “or something similarly stupid.” Your comment qualifies with flying colors.
Apple is the ONLY company that realizes you have to compromise features for a better experience? Oooooookay.
“Meh… he’s just a brainwashed cretin.”
Yep.
|
|
|
Total Posts: 6
Joined 2005-10-30
|
Posted: 10 April 2006 01:24 AM
Beeblebrox - Apr 09, 2006 11:29pm Apple is the ONLY company that realizes you have to compromise features for a better experience? Oooooookay.
But you’re removing my comment from the context from that discussion entirely. I was speaking in reference to software design of iLife applications.
Now is that debatable, yes. But the facts in my comment are still truth: “Apple compromise features” - is that comparative to this other statement “Microsoft innovate, not Apple”? No. It’s not.
Beeb, I only mean this as advice. You have ways of making your arguments sound convincing, but I don’t think myself, at least, will be able to take you seriously until your points of evidence are more substantial.
YES, I know, and before you come back with, “but this is exactly how all ‘macbot’s’ argue too” think to yourself: is arguing on that same level really helping anyone? If you argued from a higher standpoint, I think you might stand a chance at beginning to convince the people who matter.
Best,
-Luke
|
|
|
Total Posts: 1108
Joined 2005-03-16
|
Posted: 10 April 2006 02:49 AM
Luke Mildenhall-Ward - Apr 10, 2006 01:24am But the facts in my comment are still truth: “Apple compromise features” -
That’s not what you said, Luke, and you know it. You said:
“Apple is THE ONLY COMPANY that realizes you have to compromise features for a better experience.”
The context of that is pretty straight-forward. Apple “is the only company.”
And btw, it’s not like you’re NOT removing this other guy’s comments from their context either. Why should anyone treat you any different than you’re treating this guy?
is that comparative to this other statement “Microsoft innovate, not Apple”?
Well, before you rewrote history to pathetically wiggle off of your own petard, your actual comment:
“Apple is the ONLY company that realizes you have to compromise features for a better experience” and “Microsoft innovates, not Apple” are basically the same.
No difference. Both absurdly retarded, and as you said, “brainwashed.”
YES, I know, and before you come back with, “but this is exactly how all ‘macbot’s’ argue too” think to yourself: is arguing on that same level really helping anyone?
You mean arguing on the level of the idiot who said: ““Meh… he’s just a brainwashed cretin”?
I’m not. I’m saying that the two of you are saying the exact same thing, only about different companies, and there is no difference between the stupidity of either statement.
|
|
|
Total Posts: 6
Joined 2005-10-30
|
Posted: 10 April 2006 03:45 AM
Beeblebrox - Apr 10, 2006 02:49am
That’s not what you said, Luke, and you know it. You said:
“Apple is THE ONLY COMPANY that realizes you have to compromise features for a better experience.”
The context of that is pretty straight-forward. Apple “is the only company.”
So I’m the one ‘re-writing history’ now, huh? You wanna see my actual comment? OK, thanks:
Apple are the only ones who have realized you do have to compromise on features for a better experience.
And here’s what you are claiming I said:
Apple is THE ONLY COMPANY that realizes you have to compromise features for a better experience
I actually didn’t even mention “company” in my original comment. This is you trying to take it out of context again. Even by stooping to the level of changing what I said and claiming it’s what I “actually” said.
Beeb, my newfound respect for you is becoming quickly short-lived with this ‘gutter’ side to you I’m seeing. It’s quite disappointing that you’re trying to turn my words around into something else just to cover your original screw-up of mistaking someone else’s comment for one of mine in your first post.
I really thought you would have been bigger than this. You could’ve just admitted you were wrong from the start; heck, do it now and I still won’t hold it against you. But please don’t keep ridiculously trying to peddle anything from these comments of mine you’re using as evidence. You might as well bring in one of my shoes and somehow twist that against me. I bet you could as well.
I don’t think this is the right place to continue this discussion because you’ve taken my original thread off-topic. Please PM me if you want to do more arguing. Thank you.
-Luke
|
|
|
Total Posts: 1108
Joined 2005-03-16
|
Posted: 10 April 2006 05:03 AM
Luke, your pathetic and incredibly dishonest ranting aside, here are the two comments yet again:
“Apple are the only ones who have realized you do have to compromise on features for a better experience.”
“Microsoft and OpenSource world inovate, not Apple.”
One is about Apple. The other is about Microsoft. Both comments are stupid, brainwashed, moronic.
I’m not sure if the other guy is quite so hypocritical and dishonest as you are, on top of being brainwashed, but I kind of doubt it.
|
|
|
Total Posts: 5
Joined 2007-10-29
|
Posted: 05 November 2007 12:26 PM
Facts, figures and pictures from the first six years of the $17 billion device - story of ipod. If this is not inovative enough…
|