Confessions of a Mac Zealot

by Chris Seibold May 05, 2005

Today I found myself in an interesting conversation. A recent “switcher” and I were discussing the possibility that Google may, some day, crush Microsoft. The usual arguments were bandied about like cheap shuttlecocks over a net of malformed opinion and little agreement was reached. A wholly uninteresting conversation one would think. Yet one nugget of interesting mind fodder was presented when I opined that if Google destroys Microsoft then Apple would surely be ground to a fine paste as well. My friend replied that I was simply nuts (or otherwise lacking in the cerebral department, I believe an expletive was invoked) and ended by declaring: “Nah, most Mac users are crazed, they’ll never give up.”

Which brings up the interesting question: just how many Mac users are so hard-core they will never consider using anything but a Mac? Let it be noted that just asking someone if they will always use a Mac is really not a very good indicator of commitment to the platform. Take, for example, myself. I would consider myself to be receptive to other platforms. I’m not much of a Windows basher and I can get by using XP when pressed to do so. It’s not an experience I truly enjoy but I can be productive using Microsoft’s OS and non-Apple hardware. If I were to give myself a rating I’d call myself a solid Apple supporter but certainly not an Apple zombie.

Unfortunately introspection indicates this may not be the case. After our conversation I took the opportunity to fire up the G4 in OS 9 just for old time’s sake. I was aghast. You see I had vociferously defended OS 9 against XP when XP was initially released. I pointed out the problems in the original version of XP. I stamped my feet and shouted at the top of my lungs that OS 9 was obviously, to anyone who would try both platforms for even the fewest of days, the better OS. When people would point out the advantages of XP over 9 I would be dismissive, I mean is preemptive multitasking really a big deal? (answer=yes). After messing about in OS 9 for just a little while it was clear that I was wrong, XP is the better system and it is a difficult to call the race close.

My opinion, no matter how fervently believed at the time, was obviously some sort of self-delusion. The likely culprit in this case was a heaping plateful of confirmation bias. I, apparently, had already decided that XP was inferior to OS 9 (probably OS 8 through 6 as well) and thus rejected any evidence that didn’t integrate well with my pre-formed opinion. In my defense I will say that confirmation bias is a very common occurrence in most folk’s daily lives. You know nothing is going to be as good as: an iPod, Toyota, John Deere etc. so nothing ever will ever convince you otherwise (or use your own example, you get the idea).

Which brings the conversation full circle. Just what percentage of Mac users are, in reality, zealots? I don’t suppose there is any true way to know this number. Obviously only counting the rabid foamy-mouthed cult of Mac types would leave out the folks who see themselves as completely rational users making a sober, conscious decision. Basically people such as myself.

How could one get an accurate counting of people who think they are making a somber, rational decision but are, in actuality, falling prey to the less logical part of their brain? It will have to be sufficient to realize such people exist. In the end I think my friend is right. There are a percentage of people who will stick with Macs unless something simply superlative comes along. It can’t be something a little faster, or slightly simpler or even substantially cheaper. If the Mac is ever completely supplanted it will take something that is honestly revolutionary. The bright side of learning that I’m a Mac zealot is that, for now, I’m right.

Comments

  • I would say I’m a “functional Mac zealot”, because I will prefer and suggest Macs for office work, but still use any system that is available and be quite proficient with it. But on a personal level, I won’t take anything other than a Mac, even if it costs me an arm and a leg.
    And, like you said, if the Mac ever dissapears, I will take the next revolutionary computing platform, even if that means Windows (but c’mon… Windows revolutionary?).

    Joe had this to say on May 06, 2005 Posts: 5
  • There is no other choice but Mac.  Whenever I’m on a PC because an office forces me to use one, I swipe the network connection and run it into my PowerBook.  Fortunately, being an editor keeps me pretty Mac happy as FCP and AVID run on Macs.  Sadly, these days, AVID has it in for Apple and they’ve been running cheaper systems on Windows - which really blows because the architecture of Windows is not media savvy.  It’s so much easier to navigate through OS X to work on mulitmedia projects than it is on Windows.
     
    Windows is great for IT people to run the office with an iron fist because no one can understand how the hell to work through all the lame network scenarios.  Oddly enough, whenever their precious Windows system fails, they hate to come over and fix it.  I’m always amazed at how many steps it takes to do anything on Windows!  Why would people put themselves throught that?

    With that non-pithy comment out of the way, I can’t honestly say how I would react to a new system.  I’m pretty stuck in my Macintosh habits.  And for post-production, it would be a long while before a new system was able to wiggle its way into that world.  So, I can’t imagine switching right away.  There would be so many determining factors since I’m not just a web browser and e-mail type of guy.

    Interesting thought though.  The possibilty of another major operating system in the consumer market would be pretty wild.

    pJ

    pJ had this to say on May 06, 2005 Posts: 1
  • You make some very good points about confirmation bias. As I’ve been a Mac user since 1990, I’ve become less delusional and more practical. It’s just a computer after all. Thank God though that Apple makes them performance-progressive and good looking. They hardly need to be defended—they speak for themselves. Unfortunately, to stay competitive, they aren’t crafted quite like they were in the late 80s-early 90s—they use a lot of the same cheap parts as their counterparts, just in a more integrated way. Apple also is a poster child for marketing, which by nature is a front, and some of it’s really over the top, lending an air of un-trustworthyness. Microsoft should be put in jail for the software they put out, but Apple is far from perfect—bugs abound. That said, I’m so glad I have a Mac to work in every day!

    eyehop had this to say on May 06, 2005 Posts: 19
  • My opinion, no matter how fervently believed at the time, was obviously some sort of self-delusion. The likely culprit in this case was a heaping plateful of confirmation bias. I, apparently, had already decided that XP was inferior to OS 9 (probably OS 8 through 6 as well) and thus rejected any evidence that didn’t integrate well with my pre-formed opinion.

    I have yet to meet a Mac enthusiast to whom this didn’t apply.  I’d argue, in fact, that it still applies to all Mac systems, including Tiger.

    As I’ve stated before, I use both systems and I just don’t rank OS X any higher or easy to use overall than XP.  Some things are easier on XP.  Some things are easier on OS X.  It all kind of balances out. 

    But what the Mac partisans tend to do is overplay all of the Mac advantages while overplaying all of XP’s faults.  They also, of course, underplay OS X faults (or even worse, spin them into positives, like the single-button mouse) and underplay XP’s advantages.

    For example, I was trying to share individual folders in OS X yesterday without having to copy them into my Public folder.  This can’t be done natively in OS X (at least not very simply) and requires a 3rd party plug-in.  On XP, it’s simply a matter of right-clicking on the folder and choosing Sharing.

    In XP, setting up a network requires IP address and all kinds of pains.  On OS X, I just plug in my network cable and I’m good to go.

    Beeblebrox had this to say on May 06, 2005 Posts: 2220
  • I work in broadcasting at the production level, and back in the early 90’s a co-worker and I were discussing the fact that, at that time, there were so many more computer based production tools for the Mac than for wintel.  It was an amiable discussion, but at the very end he said,”...the bottom line is, I don’t have to use a Mac.”

    As this little sentiment has stuck with me over the years I have adopted it as one of my own, and the net result is that, I don’t use wintel products because I don’t have to.  Its plain, its simple, and I believe for me, its honest.

    Of course the part of this sentiment that is flawed for a Macintosh user is, “...because I don’t have to”, the reality is that most employers don’t and won’t give you a choice, and therein lies the only real dig, as far as I’m concerned.  When my technical, philosophical, and personal choices are dogmatically taken away from me, I tend to get a bit edgy.

    And here’s the proverbial straw on the camel’s back:
    Because I want, and yes, even demand a product/platform choice, I’m somehow being arrogant?  Self-deluded?  Closed minded?  Please.

    As a final thought, when it comes to personal computing, I see the world as a pretty surreal place - two choices, I mean two actual/real choices. (As opposed to Dell vs. Gateway vs. HP vs. etc.)  For desktop computing the whole planet lives in self delusion.  I believe, without a doubt, that if we had more product choices, operating systems, hardware and os’s, the world would already be a much better place than it is with regard to personal computing.  At this moment in technical history we are nothing but pawns in a very biased and unbalanced economic and philosophical battle between two companies.

    submitted to applematters.com on May 13, 2005.

    ralphsears had this to say on May 13, 2005 Posts: 1
  • Page 1 of 1 pages
You need log in, or register, in order to comment