If Your iPod Could Talk, The 10 Things It Wouldn’t Say

by Janet Meyer May 15, 2006

Smart Money Magazine runs a regular column called 10 Things. The title of the column in the June 2006 issue is 10 Things Your iPod Won’t Tell You.

I want to touch briefly on each “thing” author Noah Rothbaum discussed. I will be paraphrasing his headings.

1. The day may come when iPod isn’t king. The author bases his opinion on Apple’s proprietary format. He quoted the Senior Analyst for Consumer Electronics at iSuppli as saying that closed systems tend to either become more compatible or eventually lose their market share to the competition.

I’m not so sure this is something that Apple needs to disclose, even if it is true. It’s an opinion, not a startling new fact. Anyway, I doubt that many customers choose an iPod just because the company is #1.

It’s difficult to stay on top forever. Sooner or later the competition will be more competitive. While other companies improve their offerings, either Apple will adapt it or it won’t. In any case, the word may in the author’s statement means he gets it right either way.

2. When you need help with your iPod, don’t count on Apple. Rothbaum explains that customers get only one free phone call, and that has to be used in the first 90 days. After that you pay or you’re on your own.

He also tells readers of sites where they can get plenty of free help. These sites include Apple’s website, which he states offers “tons” of advice. He also suggests logging onto iLounge.com or iPoding.com for more free help.

Rothbaum would be more convincing if he showed evidence that other MP3 manufacturers offered better customer service than Apple. One major source does compare Apple to other companies. An article in Consumer Reports indicates that Apple rated best (by quite a bit) in customer support of desktops and laptops. This doesn’t necessarily mean that the support is as good for iPods, but it does give an indication that the company is more customer oriented than most.

3. Rothbaum contends that an iPod is more fragile than other MP3 players. This is another comment that was only backed up by the opinion of one person, somebody described as an industry analyst. Rothbaum doesn’t quote any industry testing or use other means to back up his claim. He does suggest, though, protecting your iPod with a nice shell.

I agree with his last conclusion. Protection is a good idea for any MP3 player.

4. Apple doesn’t make it easy to move your songs from your iPod to any other device. According to the author, Apple made it difficult because music companies were concerned about copyright infringement. Rothbaum then goes on to tell users just how to go about moving your songs.

5. Your iPod apparently won’t tell you about it’s battery life. To some degree, Rothbaum makes a valid point here. I have known people who choose other MP3 players just because they don’t want to have to deal with iPod’s battery issue.

The only really misleading thing here is making it sound like a secret that Apple won’t tell you. Check it out on the Apple website. This site gives all the information you need about battery life and the replacement program, though it can be a bit cumbersome to find it all. If you don’t understand it, Hadley Stern will point you to a page that will clarify the policy.

6. iPods can harm your hearing. AppleMatters has discussed this issue here and here. Rothbaum never points out that studies have been done showing the same risk with portable CD players. It’s just a wild guess, but I suspect other MP3 players with the volume up pose the same threat to hearing.

7. iPods are updated too frequently. This can be a problem for people who always want the latest technology. Apple has made things better recently by standardizing iPod docks. This means that future iPods should fit into today’s docks.

8. iPod won’t tell you that it is so popular that you need to watch for thieves. While it’s true that iPods are stolen much more often than other MP3 players, I’m not sure why Apple needs to disclose this. Any popular item that is easily stolen and easily fenced is a target for thieves.

9. iPod now charges for items that used to come with the player. (The article doesn’t tell you that they’ve reduced prices on some players.) Rothbaum states that wall chargers and docks used to be standard but now cost extra.

My guess is that Apple, like any other for-profit company, is charging what the market will bear. As long as it can keep selling things separately, it will. I suspect that it’s no secret to consumers. They seem to manage to purchase what they need to go with their iPods.

10. Once you buy an iPod, you’re stuck for life. (The author actually uses the words “locked in for life.”

This is quite an interesting point. Rothbaum suggests that owners have no options because of iPod’s proprietary format. He doesn’t suggest that it’s possible to own several iPods of different manufacturers, or that you can use the directions he gave earlier to transfer your music elsewhere.

It gets even more interesting. Rothbaum states earlier (remember point #1?) that this same proprietary format will cause iPod to lose it’s place as #1. Even in his final comments, he says that this format “could lead to its downfall.” Somehow it seems that if iPod users are unable to change, iPod use should remain high.

This article could have been more useful if some of it’s points were backed up better. I’m sure the writer doesn’t get much space to do that. This is really the problem with columns like this. They give the consumer something interesting to read, but no real analysis.

Would an article like this make a difference in your iPod purchase? I’d be interested in hearing what you think.

Comments

  • You know, I own a 1G and a 3G iPod, and I will get me a new one the moment they hit 80GB. I would also buy any other device that has an equally well designed UI and syncs perfectly with iTunes. Anyone? I don’t buy from the iTMS, and honestly I am sick of loudmouths who cannot even distinguish between iPod, iTunes and the iTMS. I use the iTMS to sample CDs which I then order as I care about quality. So most of the points here are… pointless. Ok, the battery doesn’t last 120h, so what? Anyone with will working ears will tell you why certain devices have such enormous battery life, their amplifier stage is pure garbage. I am also sick of people who constantly complain about the file transfer “issue” as it interferes with their piracy habits, or people who fail to understand the product but buy it anyway & then complain. RTFMASU!

    Valid point:
    There are very efficient coating technologies to make surfaces scratchproof. Apple should employ them. The looks of the device would not have to suffer because of that.
    Also, it would be nice if Apple could finally solve the gapless playback issue and add an optical out.

    Bad Beaver had this to say on May 15, 2006 Posts: 371
  • Apple just replaced my 40 GB iPod under Apple Care.  No problems - which is why I get Apple Care.

    MacKen had this to say on May 15, 2006 Posts: 88
  • I have purchased three “IPOD” types - because technically they are the best players out there.
    The fact that they are made by Apple, a company I despise, is just one of the facts of life one must deal with.
    I have found hacks and programs and utils on the ‘net that allow me to copy, move, organize my music (I pay for it and it is MINE ) to anywhere and to as many places as I need (I paid for it, so I will take it with me where ever I choose to)
    Apple’s membership in the RIAA and their unlimited support for the same has put my next purchase on hold.  I will wait to see the next gen of non-apple products before buying the newest pod for 2006.
    <One of my old ‘pods is now my son’s, another will be similarly jettisoned when I buy my new one.  The hacks travel with them>
    My main issue with Apple and the rest of the poseurs who climb on the wagon is just this:
    You buy it YOU own it and NO ONE should tell you how to use it.
    period.
    Music, books, Ipods, cars and movies - I own it, I have the right to copy, move, use as many times as I want to - Sales not included.
    “Opportunity Loss” is a concept the Harvard Business School started in ‘81 (I was there) to excuse poor business management and put the onus on the customers.  There can be no loss without a “loss”.  A lost oppportunity is a failure of management, not of the consumer.


    Anyway, I liked both articles - keep it up - getting more than one point of view is what keeps us all informed

    Primemage

    HellStorm had this to say on May 15, 2006 Posts: 1
  • This article wouldn’t cause me to hesitate from buying another iPod in the slightest. It’s a great technology with an elegant design. Like all other devices, it’s not perfect…but a lot of its immense popularity and success have made it a nice big target for naysayers, the jealous, and the legally opportunistic.

    For example, the iPod volume control litigation and media chatterings are just ridiculous. I can do more damage through numerous other audio devices and practices…should manufacturers financially reward the stupidest of their customers with settlements?

    Regarding being “on your own”, I’ve had to return one for repair, after the 90-day warranty. “No problem, here’s a new one,” said the friendly Apple Store employee.

    The iPod/iTMS/iTunes combination, in its current form, has obviously worked for many millions of consumers, who seem to enjoy it, flaws, proprietary formats and all. Those who complain about it should try something else and STFU. smile

    Weave had this to say on May 15, 2006 Posts: 5
  • This article just goes to show that journalists feel compelled to write about the iPod phenomenon, even when they haven’t got anything to say…

    sydneystephen had this to say on May 15, 2006 Posts: 124
  • It also shows that they’re often misinformed/can’t be bothered to check the accuracy of their comments/more interested in sensationalism than accuracy.

    Benji had this to say on May 15, 2006 Posts: 927
  • (Referring to Smart Money rather than Ms Meyer I hasten to add.)

    Benji had this to say on May 15, 2006 Posts: 927
  • I own two recent iPods - 30G Photo and 4G Nano and bought them for their craftmanship not loyalty to iTunes, iTMS, nor Apple. And neither because I wanted to be one of the 50 million or so proud owners.

    So if most buyers had similar reasons (after all, most are not currently Mac users) then for them to leave the iPod ecosystem of ease-of-use and simplicity will be unimaginable. Although I can imagine a seeming “fault” in the closed iPod universe, I disagree with many analysts and journalists in that it is its savior not its demise. The iPod’s architecture is based on software not hardware. How many will admit that Windows is an open system? Do you have people calling on Bill to make Windows play nice with Linux or OS X? I think not. So why do we expect Apple to do the same? As long as the iPod is milking cash I do not expect any change to its corporate strategy, either.

    It is a known fact that consumers look for a common standard to justify their purchases (even if only a pseudo-standard such as Windows). They only have to look around the retail shop to see the millions of i-accesories for the iPod system to realize just what is the “standard” MP3 player to make the choice. It is not rocket science there.

    Yes, the competition will have better designed devices (I have seen and test driven the new SanDisk and Creative flash players) and they will gain some market share on the low end. When this happens will be a win-win for potential customers and current users as Apple will then lower their price points to fend off encroachment at its low and mid-tier products.

    Mr. Rothbaum needs to clarify his points with better research with objective opinion and criticism not because he hates the idea of shelling out $500 for a decent MP3 player.

    Robomac had this to say on May 15, 2006 Posts: 846
  • Page 1 of 1 pages
You need log in, or register, in order to comment